Recent Posts

Why does Epic need $1B in new funding? Is this all about Roblox?
Move over Gabe, there’s a new sheriff in town

Bloomberg is reporting that Epic is seeking to raise $500M to $1B in new funding. Tim Sweeney, Epic CEO and provocateur extraordinaire, owns 60% while Tencent owns the other 40%.

Why would Epic need more funding as it continues to rake in Fortnite money? Tim has bigger ambitions, let’s figure out what they are. As we’ve seen with Roblox, there’s incredible (and growing) money to made in user generated game content. Furthermore, consider the games spawned from mods: Counter Strike, the MOBA genre, Team Fortress, Auto Battlers, H1Z1 (which becomes PUBG which becomes Fortnite)… Imagine if you were able to take even 10% of the lifetime revenue of those titles. Despite Tim’s criticism of platform holders, Epic takes a cut of many games that run on Unreal as part of the licensing agreement. This is reportedly how Fortnite pivoted to BR: Epic got an enormous cheque when PUBG was blowing up.

The pieces have been coalescing:

  • Content creation tool in Unreal – which now scales to mobile
  • Direct to consumer distribution – Epic game store – which now scales to mobile
  • User Acquisition engine and revenue bedrock – Fortnite

But I think this play would blur more of the line between gaming and social networking. The biggest evidence comes from Epic’s acquisition of Houseparty, an app that essentially lets users join a Zoom call and play games together. How else do you explain that acquisition? It ties into their already created, but lesser known, Fortnite Party Hub app and recently announced Party Royale.​

The recent foray into non-gaming content via Fortnite concerts makes more sense in this light as well (or they’re trying to keep the Fortnite in the mainstream).

This helps explain hiring as well; in less then a year Epic has setup offices in practically every major gaming hub: Seattle, San Francisco, Stockholm, Montreal, Helsinki and Berlin. Recent jobs ads focus on the social.

Sort of Facebook circa 2010: lots of quizzes & confusion

Competition is spinning up in the meantime. Manticore games has already launched an alpha, and it’s hard to imagine Roblox being content with only owning the 10-14 yr old demo. It’s important to note this is nothing like a ‘metaverse’ as each game on the platform would retain a distinct identity, whereas a metaverse is closer to the failed PS Home or Second Life. Trying to squeeze hundreds of experiences onto one game presents a variety of complications and very little in the way of benefits.

Maybe when it’s all said and done, Fortnite let’s Tim become the social platform holder Zuckerberg always wanted to be at Facebook.

Why do contestents break the rules in Netflix’s Too Hot To Handle?
Too Hot to Handle's Francesca Reveals Retreat Life Was Strict ...

Economists like Tyler Cowen or Brad DeLong are too self-respecting to study reality shows. Fret not, this economist has no such self-respect.

Previously, we examined the economics of the reality show genre but just as interesting are the economics of the a particular reality show’s design.

To Hot Too Handle introduces of the most interesting examinations of communal property dynamics: a group prize is reduced when individuals act in their short-term private interest.

At a more practical level, the show gathers ten attractive 20 somethings into a villa in Mexico for three weeks. Cameras are littered around the villa with the exception of bathrooms (to be replaced with mics). The contestants are only informed of the rules once the cameras start rolling; if they masturbate, kiss, or engage in any sort of sexual activity the prize pool of $100,000 is reduced. It’s unclear to contestants how “expensive” each activity is or how the prize pool will be divided or won. Shockingly, interviews with the show’s producers reveal they didn’t have the rules or the costs figured out until they happened. While there’s no traditional contestant elimination process, producers will ask contestants to leave if they’re not invested in the “process”. Supposedly, the show wants to teach these singles how to form emotional rather then physical connections.

The spectacle for viewers is how hard it is for these contestants to keep in their pants – of the original $100,000, over $40,000 is lost. Seems like a lot, right? How could they give up so much money?

Well… It’s really not that much. On the face of it $100,000/10 = $10,000 per contestant. The tax situation matters greatly – U.S. contestants or those with residency in the U.S. will probably pay about 50% of that $10,000 in taxes. Interestingly, if the show took place in the U.S. rather than Mexico, all contestants would be subject to U.S. taxes. It appears to the case that the Brits and Canadians don’t face game show taxes.

On a expected payout basis, the costs are far less then they might appear:

  • $3,000 for a kiss is only $300 on a per contestant basis. Only $150 after taxes.
  • $6,000 for oral sex = $600 gross, $300 after taxes.
  • $20,000 for sex = $2,000 gross, $1,000 after taxes.

The show filmed for 3 weeks, at a max payout of $10,000 this is a yearly salary of $173k. Not bad, but many of the contestants already out gross that. Francesca Fargo is estimated to have a net worth of over $500k alone. Almost all of the contestants make money off their likeness or brand. Like Francesca, they model, sell clothing or act. Thus, building an Instagram following is directly connected to their revenue stream. Breaking the rules can help the contestants build that brand – losing out on $300 now could be much more in brand awareness later. Those without brands seemed to leave early or not attempt anything “interesting” – see Madison – a late arriver who never coupled up.

But the rules weren’t clear on splitting the prize and contestants could have been under the impression only 1 or 2 would win. Under an expected value model the payout is the same: $10,000 ($100,000 *10% chance of winning). However, if you feel as though you’re a weak contestant you might estimate yourself at less than 10% probability to win. I think this was the case for sorority girl Hailey who broke the rules a mere two episodes in and had no interest in continuing.

I think there’s room for improvement in the show’s design. It was rather strange to reveal to contestants who the rule-breakers were so early in the show. This introduced social shaming as retaliation for rule breakers, speculation and investigation makes for far more drama. If the show was about temptation, why not focus more on the money or relationships? Maybe contestants can choose to eliminate their show’s squeeze – money AND sex as tests of genuine connection. Discounting seems like a great lever for drama injection – this week sex is 50% off! Adding new contestants didn’t seem to work, everyone had coupled up by the time they got there. Subtraction or an elimination is lot more fun.

Well, here’s to a solid season two. Hopefully, the show remains tongue in cheek. But not literally – that would be a rule violation.

The Economics of Reality TV

The Circle Brazil | Netflix Official Site

In case you haven’t been paying attention, Netflix just re-discovered the reality/reality-doc genre. In 2 weeks:

  • Tiger King
  • To Hot Too Handle (international cast)
  • The Circle (4 international versions already released)
  • Love is Blind

I chuckled a bit when when Netflix remarked that they saw Fortnite as their biggest threat, but after 6 weeks in quarantine, they may have been on to something. Reality television is an awkward, but fun shot back at digital Travis Scott concerts.

The economics of reality shows have always favored cost. Casts cost $0, 1 or 2 filming locations, short shoot time (sub 6 weeks), and strong vitality potential that front loads views (no one is watching the back catalogue of Survivor). But why now, 7 years since House of Cards launched?

I think this is a simple growth parable: they’ve hit diminishing returns on drama, and this is the next highest expected marginal value item on the menu. In other words, they’ve picked the low hanging, high value fruit already. Widespread international distribution expands the watercolor effect and achieves economy of scale. Shows with live elements like Idol and Got Talent are forced in country specific renditions which limit audience reach. Subtitle support for international versions of shows like The Circle helps it reach English audiences and vice-versa. Living in Europe, you’d be surprised of the appetite for English content across non-native speaking countries.

They’re innovating reality game design as well (or at least the 3rd party studios are). Technology play a huge role in all shows, almost always as a form of communication (or lack thereof). To Hot Too Handle introduces of the most interesting examinations of communal property dynamics: a group prize is reduced when individuals act in their short-term private interest. The Circle asks how people make decisions on limited information – contestants can only communicate over text.

If the last last years have been golden age of TV dramas, maybe the next 10 will be the golden age of reality TV.

How to find your ideal business advisor

Suspendisse arcu ipsum, elementum ac viverra sed, iaculis eu neque.

Suspendisse arcu ipsum, elementum ac viverra sed, iaculis eu neque. Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet sit amet in ante.

Nunc pellentesque porttitor justo, et scelerisque elit hendrerit vitae. Praesent tincidunt feugiat commodo. Duis augue lorem, lobortis a nibh ac, sollicitudin pellentesque leo turpis ut, commodo metus. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Aliquam quis odio at dui bibendum rhoncus.

Proin aliquet, arcu a pulvinar euismod, purus lectus tempus orci, non aliquet risus ligula eget augue. Etiam pulvinar efficitur ipsum non facilisis. Proin felis augue, tempus eget gravida ac, consectetur nec mauris. Vivamus aliquam efficitur sapien, in interdum ex facilisis et. Ut at dui at nisi elementum eleifend non non arcu. Fusce eleifend congue dignissim. Aliquam tellus enim, maximus quis sem ut, lobortis molestie enim.

Lorem ipsum

Morbi tincidunt enim id blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget.

Vivamus ligula felis

Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci.

Libero vehicula ligula

Morbi tincidunt enim id blandit sodales. Sed sed libero dictum vitae tincidunt.

Tincidunt tortor

Blandit sodales. Sed sed libero  ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci.

Lorem ipsum: elementum ac sed & iaculis eu neque.

Quisque vitae felis enim. Aenean erat mauris, pellentesque eu pellentesque id, volutpat vel nisl. Quisque id dui eu ex efficitur tristique. Vestibulum eget ex bibendum, ullamcorper mi a, commodo turpis. Maecenas suscipit massa lorem, vitae imperdiet neque ultrices a. Suspendisse arcu ipsum, elementum ac viverra sed, iaculis eu neque. Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet sit amet in ante dolor amet.

01.

Guaranteed results

Morbi tincidunt enim id blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae tincidunt orci.

02.

Perfect implementation

Blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci.

03.

International experience

Bblandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci.

04.

Positive feedback

Lorem enim – dolor id blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa.

Conclusion

Vestibulum eget ex bibendum, ullamcorper mi a, commodo turpis. Maecenas suscipit massa lorem, vitae imperdiet neque ultrices a. Suspendisse arcu ipsum, elementum ac viverra sed, iaculis eu neque. Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet sit amet in ante dolor amet.

Main business consulting trends 21/22

What to expect in 21/22

Quisque vitae felis enim. Aenean erat mauris, pellentesque eu pellentesque id, volutpat vel nisl. Quisque id dui eu ex efficitur tristique. Vestibulum eget ex bibendum, ullamcorper mi a, commodo turpis. Maecenas suscipit massa lorem, vitae imperdiet neque ultrices a. Suspendisse arcu ipsum, elementum ac viverra sed, iaculis eu neque. Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet sit amet in ante dolor amet.

01.

Vivamus ligula felis dictum vitae massa

Morbi tincidunt enim id blandit sodales – sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum tincidunt orci. Vivamus ligula dictum vitae massa! Lorem blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor dolor.

02.

50%+ ligula felis dictum vitae

Vivamus ligula dictum vitae massa! Lorem blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci. Blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis vitae massa!

03.

Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet dolor

Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa! Lorem blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci.

04.

Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo dolor glavrida

Lorem enim – dolor id blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa. Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet

Conclusion

Quisque vitae felis enim. Aenean erat mauris, pellentesque eu pellentesque id, volutpat vel nisl. Quisque id dui eu ex efficitur tristique. Vestibulum eget ex bibendum, ullamcorper mi a, commodo turpis. Maecenas suscipit massa lorem, vitae imperdiet neque ultrices a. Suspendisse arcu ipsum, elementum ac viverra sed, iaculis eu neque. Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet sit amet in ante dolor amet.

Top 6 financial planing tricks

Suspendisse arcu ipsum: elementum ac viverra sed & iaculis eu neque.

Quisque vitae felis enim. Aenean erat mauris, pellentesque eu pellentesque id, volutpat vel nisl. Quisque id dui eu ex efficitur tristique. Vestibulum eget ex bibendum, ullamcorper mi a, commodo turpis. Maecenas suscipit massa lorem, vitae imperdiet neque ultrices a. Suspendisse arcu ipsum, elementum ac viverra sed, iaculis eu neque. Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet sit amet in ante dolor amet.

01.

Guaranteed results

Morbi tincidunt enim id blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae tincidunt orci.

02.

Perfect implementation

Blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci.

03.

International experience

Bblandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci.

04.

Positive feedback

Lorem enim sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula tincidunt tortor. Vivamus felis, dictum vitae massa.

05.

Education

Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis, dictum vitae massa ac, tincidunt orci.

06.

Portfolio

Lorem enim – dolor blandit sodales. Sed sed libero vehicula, cursus leo eget, tincidunt tortor. Vivamus ligula felis dictum.

Ut sed leo non magna dolor

Quisque id dui eu ex efficitur tristique. Vestibulum eget ex bibendum, ullamcorper mi a, commodo turpis. Maecenas suscipit massa lorem, vitae imperdiet neque ultrices a. Suspendisse arcu ipsum, elementum ac viverra sed, iaculis eu neque. Ut sed leo non magna ullamcorper laoreet sit amet in ante dolor amet.

subscribe to the blog subscribe to the blog
subscribe to the blog subscribe to the blog
subscribe to the blog subscribe to the blog
subscribe to the blog subscribe to the blog

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Tweets from @econosopher